This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Osgood, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Time to Get Down to Business?

The Responses of Early Years Practitioners to Entrepreneurial Approaches to Professionalism

London Metropolitan University, j.osgood{at}londonmet.ac.uk

In this article theories of the gendered nature of new managerialism are drawn upon to examine the economic rationale behind educational reform (Trow, 1994) and the marketization and economization (Ozga, 2000) of early years education and childcare services. The author concentrates on the policy attention that the early years and childcare sector has attracted from the New Labour Government since 1998, and the implications of this attention. Through an analysis of the views and experiences of practitioners at the grassroots of early education and childcare it is argued that the application of business approaches is unhelpful and inappropriate. The evidence suggests that the top-down application of a specific policy designed to emphasize and promote new managerialist entrepreneurialism was unwelcome to an overwhelmingly resistant, almost exclusively female, group of practitioners. In conclusion, it is argued that whilst practitioners are committed to heightening their professionalism, the most appropriate means of realizing this is not through a business approach, but rather one which develops and nurtures practitioners’ preferred feminized ways of operating, along collaborative lines with an appreciation of the emotional investment and personal sacrifices they make.

Key Words: early years practitioners • gender • New Managerialism • policy

Journal of Early Childhood Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 5-24 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1476718X0421001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Campbell-Barr care and business orientations in the delivery of childcare: an exploratory study Journal of Early Childhood Research, February 1, 2009; 7(1): 76 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Campbell-Barr Contextual Issues in Assessing Value for Money in Early Years Education National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2009; 207(1): 90 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Fenech and J. Sumsion promoting high quality early childhood education and care services: beyond risk management, performative constructions of regulation Journal of Early Childhood Research, October 1, 2007; 5(3): 263 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Sumsion The corporatization of Australian childcare: Towards an ethical audit and research agenda Journal of Early Childhood Research, June 1, 2006; 4(2): 99 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]