Journal of Early Childhood Literacy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bialostok, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, Vol. 4, No. 1, 65-83 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1468798404041456

Literacy and Risk: an Analysis of One Middle-Class Parent’s Taken-Forgranted Understandings of Independence and Freedom

Steve Bialostok

University of Wyoming, USAsmb{at}uwyo.edu

Alexis de Tocquevile (1969: 506) predicted that Americans would be prone to isolation and increasing individualism, ‘which disposes each citizen to isolate himself from the mass of his fellows and withdraw into the circle of family and friends; with this little society formed to his taste; he gladly leaves the greater society to look after itself’. While literacy and literacy education in this country do not have a monopoly on Tocquevile’s prophesy, his conclusions do have implications for both early literacy practice and policy. In this article I demonstrate how prevailing literacy practices and ideologies in middle-class school systems both depend on and reinforce notions of personal autonomy and independence that conform to the needs of late-modern capitalism. In order to convince or coerce middle-class parents, teachers, and students to embrace these ideologies of personhood and literacy, there must be some kind of scary ‘Other’ against which the positive image of autonomy and independence is compared – this ‘Other’ is the image of the dependent subject, with all the stereotypical assumptions about class, race, and gender that go along with that in US society. This scary ‘Other’ is conjured up through what I call ‘narratives of risk’ – hypothetical stories about the dangers that may befall children who do not embrace the kinds of literacy practices that their teachers and parents want.

Key Words: governmentality • literacy • risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early Childhood LiteracyHome page
A. Feiler
Linking home and school literacy in an inner city reception class
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, August 1, 2005; 5(2): 131 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]